February 21, 2024
San Diego County Supervisor Terra Lawson-Remer at at this time’s announcement. Screenshot by way of @SupLawsonRemer X video

San Diego County Supervisor Terra Lawson-Remer introduced Monday she is going to deliver a decision to the Board of Supervisors Tuesday to help Gov. Gavin Newsom’s $6 billion bond measure to modernize the Psychological Well being Companies Act.

She was joined by San Diego Metropolis Councilman Raul Campillo, Crystal Irving, president of SEIU Native 221 and medical professionals.

“Proposition 1 will guarantee native finest practices and state funding are aligned, which is able to permit us to assist extra folks get extra folks handled and on a path to a greater high quality of life,” Lawson-Remer stated. “The way in which we handled psychological well being and habit when the Psychological Well being Companies Act was handed will not be the identical as it’s at this time. The previous method of funding behavioral well being is not the precise method. It’s time for a change.”

The March poll initiative Proposition 1 is meant to “refocus billions of {dollars} in current funds to prioritize people which have the best psychological well being wants, reside in encampments, or affected by substance abuse points,” in response to a press release from Lawson-Remer’s workplace.

Earlier this month, Campillo authored and secured the votes from his colleagues on the San Diego Metropolis Council to help Proposition 1.

“San Diegans deserve dignified care,” Campillo stated. “Proposition 1 will assist our total area tackle our psychological sickness and substance abuse crises by investing billions in behavioral well being beds throughout California.”

Backers say Prop 1 as designed would assist to construct 11,150 new therapy beds and supportive housing, create 26,700 outpatient therapy slots, and put aside $1 billion for veteran housing together with recruiting and coaching 65,000 psychological well being employees if it passes.

The San Diego County Board of Supervisors will vote Tuesday throughout their frequently scheduled 9 a.m. assembly.

Opponents of the poll measure, a bunch referred to as Californians Towards Proposition 1, deride the measure as “enormous, costly and damaging,” saying it might price taxpayers greater than $9 billion over the lifetime of the bonds, whereas ordering the redirection of $30 billion in current psychological well being providers funds within the first decade, “slicing current psychological well being providers which might be working.”

“Prop. 1 breaks guarantees made by the voters once they first handed the Psychological Well being Companies Act in 2004,” in response to the opposition group. “The concept then was to create everlasting, devoted funding for long-neglected psychological well being providers, together with prevention, early intervention, applications for youth, applications for struggling and under-served populations, together with racially and ethnically numerous teams and LGBTQ folks. The MHSA is a confirmed mannequin, providing ‘something it takes’ to assist people who want a spread of providers.”

“Now, Prop. 1 would sharply scale back that funding, finish its dedication to psychological well being applications and take a hatchet to dozens of applications throughout the state that can’t survive with out MHSA funding. It orders counties to do extra with much less,” the group stated.

Metropolis Information Companies contributed to this text.